Hand-Picked Daily GUN DEALS

Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun Review: Pinnacle of Rimfire Revolvers?

We took the S&W 617 Mountain Gun out for an extended spin to see if this premium rimfire revolver is worth your hard-earned money.

We review products independently. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission to help support our testing. Learn more.

Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Gorgeous aesthetics
  • Superbly balanced
  • Great capacity

Cons

  • Less than stellar accuracy
  • Sporadic light primer strikes

The Bottom Line

The Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun is a particularly dapper revolver that feels great in the hand. While the gun isn’t cheap, it is cheap to shoot. A gun like this would be a prime candidate to be an heirloom gun, but a few quality control issues hold it back.

Ammo is getting really expensive across the board.

Everybody wants a gun that is cheap to operate, but not everyone necessarily wants a cheap gun.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun
Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun

The Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun is supposed to be just that --- a premium firearm that you can be proud of, but doesn’t cost an arm and a leg to operate.

But does this attractive rimfire revolver live up to the hype? Join me as I go over my 500-round experience with the 617 Mountain Gun and give you my thoughts on why it may or may not be the gun for you.

Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun Specs & Features

Specs

  • Caliber: .22LR
  • Action: Single/double-action
  • Capacity: 10
  • Barrel Length: 4.125”
  • Overall Length: 9.46”
  • Weight: 36.1 oz
  • Frame Size: K-Frame (medium)
  • Country of Origin: USA
  • Includes: Plastic hard case, cable lock

Features

  • Tyler Gun Works high-grade walnut Bear Hug Grips
  • Gold bead Patridge-style front sight
  • Adjustable rear sight
  • Stainless steel frame and cylinder

Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun Backstory

The original S&W Mountain Gun started as a collaboration between elite competition shooters Tommy Campbell and Ross Seyfried.

Both men sought to create the “perfect” outdoors revolver that was powerful, shootable, and packable.

They settled on the larger N-Frame revolver in .44 Magnum but chose a much lighter, tapered-profile barrel and a round-butt grip. And in 1988, it became a reality.

S&W Mountain Gun 45 Colt
An older S&W Mountain Gun chambered in .45 Colt (Photo: Guns Magazine)

The resulting Mountain Gun proved popular, with S&W doing additional runs in 1993, 1994, 1999, 2002, and 2005. Different calibers were also offered, including the K-Frame 617 .22LR variant.

In 2025, Lipsey’s distributor partnered with S&W to revive the Mountain Gun. They brought these guns back in their original configuration with no internal lock.

Advertisement

Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun: Accuracy & Reliability Analysis

The 617 Mountain Gun is a lightweight, medium-frame,10-shot field revolver chambered in .22LR.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun
Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun

While I suppose this could find some niche use as a gun to dispatch small varmints while hiking or camping, it seems more like a fun little target shooter to me.

With both roles in mind, I grabbed six types of ammo and set out to run through 500 rounds of simple accuracy tests at distances from 7 to 25 yards.

Accuracy

After my first shots, it was immediately apparent that the gun was shooting low and left (insert bad shooter joke here). Even in single-action, this was the case with every ammo type I tried.

The adjustable rear sight made it simple to get things relatively dialed in, although I had to move the sight further right than I’d like.

After settling in around the 250-round mark, I conducted some accuracy testing in single-action. I shot five 10-shot groups at 7 yards, using a different ammo type for each group. Below are the results.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun Target
L to R: Winchester CPHP 36gr, Remington Thunderbolt LRN 40gr, CCI Mini Mag RN 40gr, Federal Punch 29gr, Browning BPR CPHP 36gr.

I am a big S&W revolver guy; I have 10 of them. So it pains me to say that this particular 617 was less accurate than any of my other Smith revolvers, including my J-Frame snubbies.

It seemed like no matter what I did or what ammo I used, I’d get a few fliers every group. This was even the case when shooting off a rest. While the accuracy wasn’t terrible, it doesn’t quite hold up to the K-22 rimfire Smiths of old.

As expected, recoil is almost non-existent. It is an absolute pleasure to shoot in that regard.

Kobe Soft Gif

Reliability

About every three cylinders, I’d have at least one round fail to ignite. This occurred in both double and single-action, resulting in 12 rounds that didn’t go off.

I had the most failures with the Winchester and Browning ammo, and the only ammo that didn’t suffer a failure was Federal Punch.

Not quite my tempo gif

It is no secret that .22LR can be finicky. But the amount of dud rounds across various ammo types seems to suggest that the hammer be lacking just a tad bit of “oomph."

A bit of light reading shows that I am not the only one who has encountered this issue.

Level up your gun knowledge

New reviews, guides and daily deals in your inbox.

Ergonomics: Fit & Feel

Without a doubt, the best things about the 617 Mountain Gun are how it feels in the hand and how it looks.

Frame

As I always say, K-Frame is best frame. The medium frame, combined with the tapered 4-inch barrel, is amazingly balanced. It just feels right.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun Grip Left
The Bear Hug grips look and feel great.

These Tyler Gun Works Bear Hug grips that come with the gun were beautifully figured, well-contoured, and fit perfectly.

While I normally prefer orange or fiber-optic front sights for functionality, the Patridge-style gold bead front sight is a good fit here. It helps complete the classy, svelte overall look. The adjustable rear sight is simple and easy to use.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun Sights
The sighting setup is simple and elegant.

Externally, the high-polish stainless finish looks great, and the cylinder fitment and release feel good.

When loading and unloading the cylinder, I noticed that rounds were tending to stick in three of the 10 chambers. Nothing truly got stuck, but it did require extra force to fully seat the rounds, and a strong rap on the ejector rod to make sure they came out cleanly.

Trigger

A five-pull average on my Wheeler digital trigger gauge showed an average double-action trigger pull weight of 10.7 pounds, with the single-action weight right around 4.8 pounds.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun Trigger
The trigger shoe is nicely radiused and feels good on the finger.

The double-action pull is smooth, with no noticeable stacking. While the single-action pull was very clean, I would like to see a slightly lighter pull weight here. I firmly put this trigger in the “good” category, with the potential for it to get even better with higher round counts.

Improvements We’d Like To See

I’d have liked to see better accuracy from this gun. However, I do want to note that Chris Baker over at Lucky Gunner got 1-inch groups at 25 yards with his 617 Mountain Gun, so this could have been a one-off.

What doesn’t seem to be an isolated issue is the light primer strikes. A tweak to the springs or hammer mass could potentially fix this issue and greatly enhance the reliability.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun Barrel
Smith & Wesson wisely brought back the old Mountain Gun lettering.

Lastly, I’d like to see a bit tighter quality control. Given the price of this gun, I’d rather not have some overly-tight chambers and sights that need a fair amount of adjustment out of the box.

Who Is It For?

I see two distinct types of people who might be interested in this gun.

This would be a viable tool for anyone looking for a lightweight, high-capacity revolver to handle snakes and other small pests while outdoors.

It also has the potential to be a great range choice for someone looking for a high-end range toy. Assuming you get an accurate one, you are looking at a devastatingly handsome, superbly balanced revolver with no recoil that is dirt cheap to shoot.

By the Numbers

Reliability: 3/5

I had more light primer strikes than I would have liked, even taking into account the finicky nature of rimfire rounds.

Ergonomics: 4.5/5

Other than maybe adding checkering to the grips, I have no complaints. This gun feels absolutely amazing in the hand.

Accuracy: 2.5/5

I struggled to get consistent groups no matter what ammo I used. I also had to adjust the sights more than expected.

Customization: 2/5

There are a few things out there, such as trigger job kits, aftermarket grips, and red dot mounts, but there isn’t much else. This is a gun that doesn’t really necessitate modification.

Value: 2/5

$1,100 to $1,200 is a steep price for any non-competition rimfire gun, in my opinion. If this gun were issue-free, I could see it as an heirloom-type gun that reasonably commands that price.

Overall: 3/5

Our Most Popular Posts

Upgrades & Accessories

Speed Beez 617-10 Speedloader
Prices accurate at time of writing

Loading 10 tiny rimfire rounds one by one can get super annoying. Luckily, Speed Beez makes outstanding 10-shot speedloaders that can help reduce those long reload times.

TK Customs SW Mini STS KLN Red Dot Mount
Prices accurate at time of writing

If your eyes aren’t what they used to be, or you simply want to be fancy, then you can easily mount a red dot using the TK Custom SW Mini red dot mount.

ShellShock Protection EXO PRO Electronic Earmuff
Prices accurate at time of writing

Although .22LR isn’t an earthshattering round, it is still not hearing safe. Grab some ShellShock Protection EXO PRO electronic earmuffs to keep your ears safe and comfortable.

How We Tested Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun

I fired 500 rounds through this revolver using the following types of ammunition:

  • CCI Mini Mag RN 40gr
  • Winchester CPHP 36gr
  • Browning Performance Rimfire CPHP 36gr
  • Remington Thunderbolt LRN 40gr
  • Federal Champion CPHP 36gr
  • Federal Punch Personal Defense FN 29gr
S&W 617 .22LR Test Ammo

Accuracy testing was conducted at various distances between 7 and 25 yards. Groups were shot in single-action, both freehand and using a pistol rest.

Reliability was tested by firing all ammo types equally in both single and double-action modes.

Meet the Experts

Wyatt shooting the S&W 632 UC
Pew Pew Tactical Editor, Wyatt Sloan

This article was written by Pew Pew Tactical Editor, Wyatt Sloan. Wyatt is an NRA-and USCCA-certified instructor with previous experience as a competitive shooter and 10 years of home-based FFL firearm sales. Wyatt personally owns over 200 firearms, including over 20 revolvers. He grew up learning to shoot on Smith & Wesson revolvers and has remained a lifelong fan of them ever since.

Final Verdict on the Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun

If I were to sum up my time with the 617 Mountain Gun into one word, it would be “potential.” She’s fun, she’s sexy, but she has a few issues.

With a bit more quality control, I truly believe that the outstanding ergonomics and killer looks of the 617 Mountain Gun could make it a match for the S&W rimfire revolvers of old.

S&W 617 Mountain Gun
Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun

What are your thoughts on the Smith & Wesson 617 Mountain Gun? Is it something that interests you? Let us know in the comments below! Looking for other rimfire options? Check out our roundup of the Best .22LR Pistols!

Shop Products Mentioned

loading...

Written By

Wyatt Sloan

Wyatt Sloan

Editor & Senior Review Analyst

linkedin Icon
Wyatt Sloan was raised on hunting and target shooting from a young age. What started as a few guns turned into a bunch — almost 200 firearms. Sprinkle a journalism degree on top of a couple of decades of shooting experience, and he found himself at the doorstep of Pew Pew Tactical, where he enjoys sharing his hobby with fellow and aspiring gun owners. Collectively, he has 20 years of outdoor rifle, pistol, shotgun, and bow hunting experience and previously competed in USPSA. Wyatt also had 10 years of home-based FFL firearms sales and transfers. He now serves as an Editor and Fact Checker for Pew Pew Tactical.

WHY YOU CAN TRUST PEW PEW TACTICAL

Since 2016, the Pew Pew Tactical team has been dedicated to providing expert reviews and in-depth testing of guns and gear. All while keeping in mind that guns are fun and that readers come first.

Written by American gun enthusiasts, competitive shooters, former military/law enforcement personnel, and trained journalists, we use our extensive skill sets and knowledge to bring a well-rounded, researched approach to our content.

We pride ourselves on hands-on testing and real-world experience with all products we recommend. Further, we believe in objectivity and approaching all articles without bias – our few advertisers never influence our reviews or recommendations. We believe in giving our readers a comprehensive understanding of how and why a product is great – or isn’t. And if it’s good enough for us to use ourselves and recommend to loved ones.

Our content, analysis, and insights on firearms and gear are recognized across the web. We are proud to be cited by authoritative third-party platforms including Newsweek, Yahoo News, and Wikipedia, demonstrating our standing as a trusted resource in the firearms industry.

Conversation

16 Comments

Join the discussion

  • 200 guns! Where do you get the time to shoot them all?
    ...
  • Patridge NOT Partridge - named after inventor E. E. Patridge
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      Good catch! Spellchecker strikes again.
      ...
  • Close both eyes and shoot— that will solve the low and to the left problem, guaranteed.
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      This gun was shooting low left even off a pistol rest. Unfortunately it was just this particular gun that wasn't quite on from the factory.
      ...
  • I had a 617 six round with 8 inch full underlug barrel. I loved the trigger. The first time at and indoor range, shooting ten yards, I discovered that there wasn't enough windage adjustment available to put my groups in the center of the target. Closer inspection of the gun showed the barrel was not timed to the frame properly. It was sent back to S&W for repair. When it came back, I promptly sold it.
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      That sounds like a bummer, Howard. How old was the gun or long ago was this? I always like keep track of timelines regarding manufacturer issues.
      ...
      • James Rawls

        Since youre interested in such things ill tell you i bought a s&w 686+ about 2 months ago that has had basically every problem it could have. That makes the 3rd s&w ive bought over the last 10 years or so that has been a piece of crap, the other two being a sd9ve, which tbf i expected to suck cuz it was like $250 brand new, and a shield. No more smiths for me
        ...
    • Dave Baur

      I have av old K-22 Masterpiece, making it in Stainless Steel wouldn't improve it
      ...
      • Wyatt Sloan

        Dave, old K-Frames are my favorite but I do love both blued and stainless guns. I'd love to get my hands on a K-22 Masterpiece like yours. That has to be a sweet shooter!
        ...
  • So disappointing. Friend has the .44mag and .45 acp MTN guns which are amazing. I would be curious to see how the Ruger sp101 in .22 would hold up with this testing. Heard it’s solid
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      I'd love an old .45 Mountain Gun myself, and I have heard good things about the new .44 Mag and .357 Mag versions. As for the Ruger comparison, I love the SP101, but I feel like the 10-shot Ruger GP100 would be a closer comparison to the 617 Mountain Gun.
      ...
  • Make one in .22 mag, and it might be worth the money.
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      Jim, I'd love to see a .22 Mag version. If they made one, I would have 100% grabbed that over the .22LR.
      ...
  • I have a 40 y.o. S & W .22 stainless kit gun that has been back to the factory several times to fix cartridges repeatedly being stuck in the cylinder. Due to a horrendously heavy DA trigger pull, along with the sticking cartridges, the model has been in my safe much of the time. In fact, I’ve never purchased another S&W gun due to my frustration with this gun.
    ...
    • Wyatt Sloan

      I definitely understand the feeling behind not wanting to give something another shot after having so many problems. That being said, Smith does make a ton of amazing guns, even now. Maybe you might eventually find one that strikes your fancy.
      ...