Pros
- Dripping with style
- Fully forged and machined parts
- Very faithful reproduction of the original
- Reasonably priced
Cons
- We experienced some last round feeding issues
- All black iron sights can be hard to see
The Bottom Line
The MAC 1911 MEUSOC is and extremely good clone of the original Marine Force Recon pistol. It is accurate, fun, and looks amazing. However, this was dampened slightly by some reliability issues during testing.
The 1911 has one of the longest service histories of any firearm in existence.
Even when the bulk of the US military shifted to the Beretta M9 in 1985, the 1911 hung on like grim death. This was mostly due to its continued use by the Marine Corps Force Recon units.
The stubbornness of Force Recon led to them not only keeping the 1911, but also making some improvements, which resulted in one of my favorite military handguns in existence, the 1911 MEUSOC.
So when I heard that Military Armament Corp. (MAC) was dropping a sub-$700 clone of the 1911 MEUSOC, I knew I had to get my hands on one for testing.
But what even is MEUSOC? Why is this pistol cool? Is the MAC clone really that good? Keep reading to find out!
Table of Contents
Loading…
Prices accurate at time of writing
Prices accurate at time of writing
-
25% off all OAKLEY products - OAKLEY25
Copied! Visit Merchant
MAC 1911 MEUSOC Specs & Features
Specs
- Caliber: .45 ACP
- Action: Semi-Auto, single-action only
- Capacity: 8+1
- Barrel Length: 5″
- Overall Length: 8.8″
- Height: 5.55″
- Width: 1.3″
- Weight: 37.2 oz
- Magazines Included: 2
Features
- Fully forged frame and slide
- QPQ Finish
- Target crown barrel
- MEUSOC-style enhanced GI sights
- Vertical slide serrations
- Flat mainspring housing with lanyard loop
- Pachmayr wraparound rubber grips
- Era-correct markings
What is a MEUSOC 1911?
MEUSOC stands for Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable).
In the 1980s, a set of specifications was issued to bring the existing M1911A1 up to modern combat specifications for continued use by the Marine Corps Force Recon units — an element of MEUSOC.
Long story short, many of these changes were implemented, resulting in the first iteration of the 1911 MEUSOC.
The MEUSOC in this form stayed in use until 2012, when the Colt M45A1 replaced it.
There were four different versions of the MEUSOC 1911 over the years, but the MAC 1911 MEUSOC is a clone of the earlier versions.
Parts were sourced from various commercial manufacturers such as Springfield Armory, Caspian, Bar-Sto, Nowlin, Novak, Wilson Combat, King’s Gun Works, Videcki, and more. Each pistol was hand-fitted and tuned by Marine armorers at Quantico to create the ultimate operator’s handgun.
I am no expert by any means, and the parts lists can be kind of murky, but my research shows that a clone of an early 1911 MEUSOC should include:
- Millett-style front sight
- RTE-style rear sight
- Clark 180 or Wilson 66-style beavertail grip safety
- Serrated mainspring housing with lanyard loop
- King’s-style ambidextrous safety
- 3-hole speed trigger
- MGW commander-style ring hammer
- Vertical slide serrations
- Pachmayr wraparound rubber grips
In July 2025, MAC introduced its attempt at a faithful clone of the MEUSOC based on the specs listed above.
Shooting the MAC 1911 MEUSOC: Reliability & Accuracy Analysis
I am happy to report that the MAC delivered the kind of accuracy you’d expect from a reasonably quality 1911 with a good trigger.
Using standard 230-grain FMJ ammo, I was able to get a 1-inch grouping at 7 yards with all the holes touching.
Backing things out to 10 yards opened my groups up to about 2 inches, and then moving back to 15 yards opened things up to about 3-4 inches.
This gun has way more mechanical accuracy than I do, but the sights made it a bit difficult to see the target at those distances (more on that in a bit).
Reliability
MAC is a sub-brand of SDS Imports, as is Tisas. Their 1911s have been perfect for us so far, but the MEUSOC 1911 unfortunately had some issues.
In short, in the first 250 rounds, I kept experiencing sporadic failures to feed only on the last round of the magazine. The gun was well-lubed prior to shooting.
These failures happened across three different ammunition types and four different magazine types, including Wilson Combat mags.
I sent the gun back to MAC. They returned it, saying they replaced the recoil spring and extractor, and also tuned the new extractor.
The second go around was much better, albeit not perfect. I ran another 250 rounds through the gun, but this time, I only had two failures with FMJ ammo.
.45 ACP Ammo In Stock
Oddly enough, they were still last round FTFs. I suspect that a bit more break-in on the new extractor might alleviate this issue entirely, but it is tough to say.
While the FMJ ammo was now running okay, hollow points did not fare so well. Neither the Federal Syntech 205 gr JHPs nor the Hornady Critical Defense 185 gr FTX rounds ran well.
This is disappointing given how well other guns from them have run, but we aren’t here to hide any issues. Stick with FMJ, and you should be relatively okay barring a wonky extractor.
Ergonomics: Fit & Feel
THANK YOU FOR NOT MAKING YOUR GUN A BILLBOARD! Seriously, one of the best things about this gun is how minimal the markings are on it.
The slide is completely devoid of any rollmarks. On the right side of the frame, it is correctly marked “United States Property” and “M 1911 U.S. Army.”
There is a very small rollmark on the left side with the manufacturer info and serial number.
Everything is capped off with an awesome-looking QPQ finish that looks like the classic Parkerized finish on the original guns. The gun looks absolutely stunning to me.
Grips
The rubber Pachmayr wraparound grips aren’t just there for the awesome 80s vibe. They provide traction on the front strap and good grip overall.
These grips are effective in helping with recoil control. I also like that the rubber is just the right mix between hard and soft, making it really easy on the skin.
My only complaint is that the grips make the gun feel slightly wider than a 1911 that has standard grip panels.
The mainspring housing is the correct shape, but MAC went with checkering instead of vertical serrations. A slight deviation, but not too bad. The all-important old-school lanyard loop is still there.
Sights
MAC went with the older Millett-style front sight and RTE rear sight setup. While these aren’t 100% clone correct, they are really damn close.
Unfortunately, the stock sight setup gave me a bit of grief, but nothing too major.
I noticed that once I shot my orange sticker off the target, the all black front and rear sights were a bit hard to distinguish from each other in the indoor range.
If I got to keep this gun, I’d definitely be painting the front sight ramp white.
Controls
Everything is pretty faithful in the controls department.
You got your commander-style ring hammer, 3-hole speed trigger with a serrated face, appropriate grip safety, and the ambidextrous safety.
While it isn’t an exact replica of the original King’s safety, the ambi safety still looks the part and works relatively well.
I do want to point out that it is clone correct to use Pachmayr grips that are not cut for ambi safeties. However, this causes the right side safety to hit the top of the grip just before it reaches its full travel downward.
The safety still fully disengages, and it causes no functional issues. It just feels pretty weird.
Trigger
The trigger is a pretty run-of-the-mill 1911 trigger. It has a bit of take-up to a wall, followed by a pretty clean break. Reset is both tactile and audible.
I put the MAC on both the Dvorak TriggerScan machine for an advanced readout in addition to testing it with a Lyman digital trigger gauge.
It averaged 5.1 lbs across three pulls on the TriggerScan, and averaged about 4 lbs 14 oz on the Lyman gauge. Overall, the trigger is a bit heavy for my liking, but it isn’t bad by any means. I wish it had been closer to the 3.5 lb mark.
Room for Improvement
MAC really did their homework and put out a faithful, great-looking clone at an affordable price. However, there are a few things that could have been executed better.
Let me address the elephant in the room: reliability. Now, those last-round issues I had could be an isolated issue with just this gun, but nevertheless, they happened. While MAC was quick to look at the gun and return it to me in an improved state, there is definitely still room for improvement in the quality control department.
The only other real thing that I would have liked to see was a lighter trigger. While the stock trigger isn’t bad, making a 3.5 lb 1911 trigger isn’t difficult nor expensive. People love 1911s for their triggers, so I wish MAC would lean into that a bit more here.
By the Numbers
Reliability: 3/5
I had to send the gun back due to sporadic failures to feed on the last round. The gun ran much better upon return, but I still had two failures. It also does not like hollow points.
Ergonomics: 4/5
The 1911 already has an amazing grip angle and overall feel. The Pachmayr grips thicken the gun up a little, but they are comfortable. Everything still feels really good.
Accuracy: 4/5
This gun is more accurate than I am, but the sights do make it a bit difficult to see the target sometimes. The sights were also dead-on from the factory.
Customization: 3.5/5
It is a 1911, so there are a lot of aftermarket parts and shops that will do custom work. But let’s be real, you aren’t buying a clone to change the parts out on it.
Value: 4/5
With a street price of $575 to $675, it is a much more appealing proposition than spending well over $1000 and hunting down specialty parts to make your own MEUSOC 1911.
Overall: 3.5/5
Prices accurate at time of writing
Prices accurate at time of writing
-
25% off all OAKLEY products - OAKLEY25
Copied! Visit Merchant
Who is the MAC 1911 MEUSOC For?
These pistols are 100% for the cloners and LARPers who love to nerd out over Desert Storm and GWOT-era guns.
It’s cool as hell and is not overly expensive for how close to clone-correct it is. Don’t buy this gun with the illusion of making it a full-on duty gun; buy it because it looks awesome, and it is fun.
How We Tested the MAC 1911 MEUSOC
To evaluate accuracy and reliability with different types of ammo, we ran a 500-round mix of Fiocchi Range Dynamics 230gr FMJ, Winchester White Box 230gr FMJ, Remington UMC 185gr FMJ, Federal Syntech 205gr SJHP, and Hornady Critical Defense 185gr FTX.
Accuracy was evaluated with free-hand slow fire groups at 7, 10, and 15 yards. Magazines used during testing included both factory mags, Wilson Combat 47D 8rd mags, Kimber KimPro 8rd mags, and Springfield Armory/Mec-Gar 7rd mags.
Meet the Experts
Editing and adding picks to this article is Wyatt Sloan, Editor. Wyatt is an NRA-certified instructor, former competitive shooter, and avid hunter. Wyatt personally owns over 200 firearms, over half a dozen 1911s included, and has 10 years of home-based FFL firearm sales. He has used his extensive experience with firearms at large to test guns for Pew Pew Tactical — evaluating them based on our standards and metrics.
Also editing this article is Pew Pew Tactical Editor-in-Chief, Jacki Billings. She runs our experienced team of reviewers. She is a National Rifle Association Basic Pistol Instructor as well as a member of the Society of Professional Journalists, ACES: Society for Editing, and the Professional Outdoor Media Association. Jacki has a bachelor’s degree in journalism and has worked as a media professional for close to 20 years, specializing in gun media for almost 10 years. With 2,000+ articles to her name, she uses her professional journalism and editing experience to set testing protocols and editorial standards for Pew Pew Tactical.
Final Verdict on the MAC 1911 MEUSOC
Despite some reliability hiccups, I still really, really like this gun. Part of that is the nostalgia cool factor talking. Okay, most of it is. But MAC absolutely nailed the overall look and vibe.
The MEUSOC looks awesome just sitting there, and I feel like an operator when I pick it up. Most clone guns are meant to be range toys or something to show off to your buddies, and I think the MAC is perfect for just that.
What are your thoughts on the MAC 1911 MEUSOC? Let us know in the comments below! Interested in other clones? Check out our article on the 7 Best Retro Reproduction Guns!
14 Leave a Reply
The company lost me by marking "us army" on a gun meant to clone a Marine weapon. Not exactly selling it right
The Army marking is actually correct since the MEUSOC was built using the existing supply of M1911 frames that were originally Army-issued. All of the real MEUSOC guns have the same exact markings.
Looks alot like my Colt Series 70 that I breathed on a bit back in the early 80's. Milled the rear sight to accept a Millett rear and front sight, opened up the ejection port simular to a Gold Cup, without the releaf at the rear of the port. Tighten up the slide, champhered the rails, full length recoil guid rod with buffer, extended slide release and safety, bored the hammer and high polish on the sides, three hole longer trigger, tuned to 3lbs, smoth and crisp sear, full Pachmire grips with curved spring block. Opened up and polish the chamber feed ramp. Feeds hollow point without any failure to feed. The only improvement would be mill the frame and pop in a completion barrel with a feed ramp (then no case bulge, due to the releaf of the cartridge support).
A true review instead of a sales pitch is a pleasure to read. Using free hand instead of some sort of a rest for accuracy gives a more realistic outcome.
Glad you enjoyed the review! We appreciate you taking the time to check it out.
I have one of those, and like it. For some reason it feels way heavier than my other 1911s from Tisas. I had a couple failures to feed on the last round.
My MEUSOC is not more accurate than my other Tisas or my Garrison and less than my Dan Wesson Guardian, which is my top 1911. But let it be known that I suck big time at accuracy!
Overall, I'm going to de-MEUSOC it by removing the ambi safety, and other minor changes.
Interesting to hear more data points on the last round failures.
Due to the inherent accuracy of the platform , I find most quality 1911s to be pretty accurate for me on the whole. I did do a full review of the Springfield Garrison and that gun was really damn accurate for not being a semi-custom gun. I am jealous of your Dan Wesson! I'd love a PM-7 or a stainless V-Bob, but they cost a bit more scratch than I have.
Thanks for checking the article out!
I believe that he covered that in the discussion. He said they used multiple magazines, including from Wilson Combat.
It really needs a rail like the Tisas Raider and I would buy one of these in a heartbeat.
I think they are too committed to trying to stay close to clone correct with this one to go that route. It would definitely look cool with the blank slide, though.
Really no surprise - Between teaching basic to advanced pistol classes, attending pistol class and participating in informal competitions, 1911 style pistols experienced far more malfunctions than modern striker fired pistols.
Erik, the 1911 definitely has its quirks and are much pickier with things like mags, ammo, and extractors. However, there are plenty out there that run super well. Our previous 1911 GI from Tisas ran absolutely 100%, as did the Springfield Garrison. I really suspect it is the extractor in this specific case.
One note, failure to load on the last round should not be attributed to the gun. In all fairness that would be a function of the magazine, which in the case of 1911's are touchy. I'd swap out the OEM mags for Wilson Combat and shoot some more. You may very well find that last round issue dissipates.
Scott, this is always my first line of thinking on 1911s. That being said, I run 4-5 different types of magazines and about 20 mags total on every 1911 I test to rule out any magazine issues. Unfortunately, this one had issues with all of the magazines, including the Wilson 47Ds that I mentioned in the article.