Hand-Picked Daily GUN DEALS, and Exclusive Coupons Codes >>>
We select and review products independently. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission, which help support our testing. Learn more.

Gun Confiscation Around The World: Playbook & Results

How do regimes and first world countries take guns? We cover China, UK, New Zealand, Canada, and more. Plus the results on crime and current US affairs.

    We can always count on politicians to call for the passage of new firearms regulations, or outright gun bans. 

    Of course, this isn’t specific to the United States, unlike many other countries around the world, U.S. civilians have something called the Second Amendment on their side, and for the most part, are allowed to own firearms for private use.  

    Open up! We’re here to collect your guns!
    Open up! We’re here to collect your guns!

    Many countries like Australia and the United Kingdom have all but banned firearms ownership for the general public, and in the process, confiscated existing firearms owned by civilians. 

    We’ll take a look at the instances of gun confiscation, or mandatory “buybacks” that followed the enactment of new firearms regulations in countries around the world, and whether they had any effect on firearms homicides. 

    Table of Contents



    When US politicians talk about enacting new gun control laws, Australia is always mentioned as the gold standard.  That’s because Australia has one of the most restrictive firearms laws in the world.

    Australia Meme

    Licenses are required in order to purchase and own a firearm, and are only issued for the purposes of hunting, sport shooting, pest control, antique collections, and for farmers and farm workers. 

    How Did We Get Here?

    The main incident that led to the current state of firearms laws in Australia was the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, when a gunman opened fire on store owners and tourists using two semi-automatic rifles, that left 35 people dead and 23 wounded.  

    Port Arthur Bay, Port Arthur
    Port Arthur Bay, Port Arthur

    This tragic shooting led to the National Firearms Agreement of 1996 being passed just 12 days later, which included a ban on all semi-automatic rifles and all semi-automatic and pump-action shotguns, as well as a new system for firearms licensing and ownership.

    With the new laws in place, thousands of previously legally owned firearms, were suddenly rendered illegal.  The Australian government graciously offered a temporary firearm buyback program for these now-illegal firearms, which resulted in the buyback of over 650,000 firearms.

    A few years later in 2002, a mentally ill student at Monash University killed two other students with pistols he owned as a member of a shooting club. 

    Monash University, Menzies Building

    This led to the National Handgun Control Agreement of 2002, and the National Handgun Buyback Bill, that required mandatory buybacks of certain types of handguns, as well as magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.

    Most recently in 2014, during the Sydney hostage crisis, a lone gunman held 18 people inside a Lindt chocolate cafe hostage.  One hostage was killed by the gunman, one was killed by a police bullet ricochet, and the gunman himself was killed by police. 

    Law-abiding citizens turning in their guns to...stop criminals from using guns
    Law-abiding citizens turning in their guns to…stop criminals from using guns

    This incident led to the 2017 National Firearms Amnesty, which resulted in about 51,000 unregistered firearms being surrendered. 


    With two subsequent instances of tragic mass shootings following the initial National Firearms Agreement of 1996, it’s tough to say that the firearms ban and corresponding mandatory buyback programs (aka confiscations) were very effective.

    This result may be partly due to the fact that the approximately 650,000 to 1 million guns which were surrendered in the buyback programs, only account for about one-fifth to one-third of the total number of firearms in the country. 

    In terms of actual studies done on the effect of the ban and buyback programs, even a study performed by the University of Melbourne was not able to find much, if any, significant support that prohibiting certain types of firearms reduced the number of firearms homicides.

    New Zealand

    Gun control has always been a part of New Zealand’s history, stemming as far back as the Arms Act of 1860.  The Act was mostly unenforced, though, since it was originally passed during the period of conflict between the colonial settlers in NZ and the indigenous Maori people. 

    Where is new zealand
    Fun fact, lots of world maps forget to put New Zealand on them

    Labor unrests after WWI led to the Arms Act of 1920, which in addition to requiring firearms permits and registration, also banned semi-automatic pistols.

    Lead-up To Confiscation

    In 1990, a 33-year-old Aramoana man killed 13 people, including a local police sergeant, after an argument with his next-door neighbor.  This tragic shooting led to additional amendments to restrictions on “military-style semiautomatic” (MSSA) firearms.

    The most recent shooting happened on March 15, 2019, at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, when a 28-year-old opened fire at two separate mosques when prayers were being held, killing 51 people and injuring 49.

    Christchurch Memorial, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Following the Christchurch shooting, politicians went into overdrive to enact new gun legislation, leading to bans on numerous semi-automatic weapons and MSSAs.

    They also went after parts, magazines, and ammunition that could be used to assemble a prohibited firearm or convert a firearm into a semi-automatic firearm, and most importantly, a firearms amnesty and buyback scheme. 

    As of September 2019, more than 19,000 Firearms have been surrendered to the New Zealand government. 

    Is It Working?

    Unlike Australia, there have not been many studies done on the effectiveness of gun buyback programs mainly due to the fact that there haven’t been many buyback programs. 

    It’s also not clear what percentage of total firearms in the country have been turned in, because registration has been lax and essentially unenforced throughout the years. 

    If neighboring Australia is anything to go by, however, the laws may not have much effect beyond providing a false sense of security. 

    United Kingdom

    In the UK, the right to keep and bear arms originated as far back as the Assize of Arms in 1181, when King Henry II essentially required (almost) all English subjects to be armed. 

    Just the chainmail weighed in at 30+ pounds…

    This concept found its way into British common law, and eventually the colonies in North America that would eventually become the United States, in the form of the Second Amendment in the US Constitution.

    How Did We Get So Far?

    There were many laws on licensing and restrictions passed from WWI into the 1950s, but gun bans and confiscations really took off once the Firearms Amendment Act of 1988 was passed, following the mass shooting in Hungerford

    In 1987, a man used a handgun and two semi-automatic rifles in a series of random shootings to kill 16 people and injured 15. 

    Hungerford Town Hall, U.K.

    The Firearms Amendment Act following this incident banned semi-automatic and pump-action center-fire rifles, shotguns that had magazines and self-loading rifles, among other types of firearms.

    Less than 10 years later, in 1996, a man entered an elementary school gym in Dunblane, Scotland, and fired indiscriminately, with his legally-owned handguns, killing students and teachers, and injuries many others, before committing suicide.  

    The tragedy led to the Firearm Amendment Acts of 1997, which essentially banned private ownership of handguns, with very limited exceptions.  In fact, the handgun ban was so comprehensive, that even Olympic shooters were not exempt, and had to train outside the UK.

    10m air pistol

    The buyback program following the ban resulted in the surrender of over 160,000 firearms

    More recently, in 2010 a taxi driver, using a 12 gauge double-barreled shotgun and a 22 caliber bolt-action rifle, killed 12 people and injured 11, before killing himself.  

    Measuring Success

    Types of restrictive Firearms regulations in place, you would expect the number of firearms crimes to be at an all-time low. 

    During 2011 to 2014, the recorded number of firearms crimes from about 6,000 to a little under 5,000. However, that number rose back up above 6000 during the period from 2014 to 2017.   

    (Lack of) Effect of gun regulations on firearms crimes in the UK
    (Lack of) Effect of gun regulations on firearms crimes in the UK; source

    To make matters worse, crime overall in the UK has been on the rise, and in fact, London overtook NYC for the number of murders as of 2018. 

    Many of these crimes have been increasingly been perpetrated by other types of tools, primarily knives.

    Based on these results, it seems firearms regulations have not done much, if anything to reduce the number of gun-related crimes, and with crime in general on the rise, additional bans on guns, knives, or any other items that could be used as weapons, may not be the way to ensure public safety.

    Knife surrender bin in the UK, where the public can deposit their scary knives to prevent their use in crimes and everyday cooking
    Knife surrender bin in the UK, where the public can deposit their scary knives to prevent their use in crimes and everyday cooking


    The birthplace of gunpowder!  With a resume like that, it would be a shame to put any sort of regulations on firearms usage or ownership!  And it is.

    Fireworks were the first use of what would become gunpowder

    Soon after the People’s Republic of China was established by the current communist government, firearms regulations were put into place. These laws identified and helped the government take inventory of the firearms that were in the country at the end of the Civil War in 1949.

    Firearm possession was still permitted in limited situations where carrying the gun was a necessary part of a person’s official duties, with approval from the government. 

    No Gun For You!

    Unlike many other countries, regulating firearms in China was not a result of mass shootings, but rather came as the Communist Party of China likely wanted to keep tabs on all the firearms in the country after the decades-long intermittent civil war.  

    Chinese Civil War, intermittent between 1927-1949

    Did It Work?

    Since there is a blanket ban on private firearm ownership in the country, there are much fewer instances of gun violence in China compared to other countries.

    That doesn’t mean there aren’t any instances of shooting however, since hunting rifle ownership is still permitted in some situations.

    Overall, however, there is very little gun violence among the civilian population. 

    Actual data on this may give us a better idea of the effectiveness of the ban, but the Chinese government is not nearly as open with their data and statistics as other countries around the world. 


    Despite being our neighbors to the north, Canada has many restrictions when it comes to military-style rifles, non-sporting ammunition, and  “high-capacity” magazines.

    Cold outside gif
    Live stream of Canada, always (probably)

    In addition, handgun are limited to 10-round magazines, and most semi-automatic center-fire rifles are limited to 5 rounds. 

    How Did This Come Aboot?

    With Canadians being so friendly, they shouldn’t be afraid of anyone owning a gun, right?  Overall, Canada is a relatively safe country, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a share of gun crime as well.

    No single incident has been responsible for the firearms legislation passed throughout the years in Canada, however, and the gun laws are more the result of politicians attempting to address the ongoing issue of gun violence in the country.

    Not Very Effective, Eh?

    While the number of firearms-related homicides in Canada is relatively low compared to other countries, studies conducted regarding the laws passed in 1991 regarding rifles concluded that the law itself was not related to firearms homicides.

    Despite the lack of evidence showing any effect laws have had on reducing the number of firearms-related homicides, the Canadian government nonetheless has plans to begin a buyback of semi-automatic rifles in 2020


    When it comes to gun control, Japan has most other countries beat by at least a couple hundred years. In 1662, Japan prohibited possession of guns by civilians other than hunters, and in 1685 people who turned in illegal guns were rewarded. 

    Japanese rifles
    Japanese tanegashima (matchlocks) of the Edo period (1603-1868), Himeji Castle, Japan.

    Over the years the gun laws only became more restrictive. Rifles were still allowed for hunting, after applying through a very restrictive process. On the other hand, civilians were not permitted to possess handguns except for researchers conducting testing or research. 

    What’s more, when a gun owner dies, relatives must give up the firearms owned by the recently deceased gun-owner, and are not permitted to inherit the firearms. 

    Gun laws in Japan are so prohibitive, that even police officers must leave their guns at the station when off duty. 

    Trusting The Process

    Because of these laws, there is very little gun violence in Japan, since almost no one is allowed to have one.  There is still plenty of violence and crime in the country, but typically not through the use of guns.

    By that metric, the gun control laws in Japan are very successful. But then again, there is also very little tank-related homicides in countries where civilians have a difficult time obtaining tanks.   

    Tank Firing
    New meaning to the term “drive-by shooting”

    USA! USA!

    Thanks to the Second Amendment, there has always been a great amount of push back against any attempt to confiscate or “buy back” guns from the civilian population in the United States.

    The most famous attempt at gun confiscation occurred in Texas, though technically Texas was not part of the United States at the time. 

    Texas flag on a rifle strap

    Now known as the Battle of Gonzales, arose when the Mexican military demanded the settlers of Gonzales, Texas return a cannon that had been previously provided to them by the Mexican government for protection against Comanche raids.  

    The settlers were able to fend off the Mexican military, which eventually withdrew its forces, and led to the famous “Come And Take It” flag flown by 2A enthusiasts all over this great country.

    Come at me, bro
    Come at me, bro

    They’re Coming For Our Guns!

    Fortunately, there have not been any large-scale attempts at gun confiscation or buyback programs in the United States.  Because of Section IX of a little thing called the U.S. Constitution, federal and state governments are prohibited from passing ex post facto laws

    In other words, new laws cannot retroactively make previously legal activities illegal. 

    Chuck Norris Approved

    For gun owners, this means that newly passed laws cannot make previously legal possession of firearms illegal just because possession of those firearms going forward has been made illegal by any new laws. 

    That fact alone plays a big part in why there will likely not be any sort of mass confiscation of firearms in the United States. 

    Even when the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 was passed, enacting a 10-year ban prohibiting the manufacture, transfer, or possession of “semiautomatic assault weapons,” the law contained a grandfather clause to permit the possession or transfer of weapons and ammo that were legal before the law went into effect, so there were no confiscation or mandatory buyback programs.

    Another Way Around

    Even though confiscation and mandatory buyback aren’t permitted, that doesn’t mean voluntary buybacks aren’t allowed.  The City of Baltimore initiated a buyback program in 1974 in an attempt to address its rising firearms-related homicides. 

    The program didn’t go as well as hoped, as the cities gun homicide and assault rates actually increased during the buyback period. 

    George Washington after crossing the Delaware River in 1776, colorized
    George Washington after crossing the Delaware River in 1776, colorized

    It’s important to note, however, that there are gun confiscations occurring in the country, just not on a large scale.  In states with red flag laws, there are situations where firearms owners can have their guns confiscated for a period of time. 

    We won’t get too much into detail on that in this article, but you should definitely check out our red flags law article to learn more about those laws being enacted by states across the country. 

    Red Flag Laws (4)

    Political Pressure

    Of course, politicians, and even some presidential candidates in the current election cycle, don’t let little things like the US Constitution get in the way of taking away our guns, for our own protection of course. 

    Politicians seem to forget one little detail, however, that passing laws regulating guns only works when people follow those laws.

    Criminals, on the other hand, will just continue to ignore gun regulations the same way they ignore laws on robbery, assault, and even murder. 

    Passing more laws making murder super illegal won’t stop criminals from continuing to kill innocents, the same way new gun laws won’t stop criminals from illegally bringing firearms into gun-free zones. 

    Many advocates of gun control argue that voluntary buyback programs will get many guns off the streets, making them much safer for everyone. Unfortunately, the history of buybacks in this country argue otherwise. 

    In fact, the types of guns confiscated in buybacks aren’t the ones typically used in crimes. 

    Guns collected at buyback events are usually nonfunctioning guns or guns that were sitting unused, such as inherited firearms. 

    Some entrepreneurial individuals even take advantage of buyback programs and make their own guns to hand for a nice profit. 

    Ah yes, the highly sought after Hi-er point shotgun. Glad that thing is off the streets.
    Ah yes, the highly sought after Hi-er point shotgun. Glad that thing is off the streets.

    So What’s The Solution?

    There are many arguments on how to address the issue of firearms-related homicides in the US, but confiscation and forced buybacks should be at the very bottom of the list. 

    Aside from the legal issues surrounding forcibly taking away legally-owned firearms, there might not be too many members of law enforcement willing to go door-to-door demanding people hand over their guns.  

    Even from the few countries mentioned in this article, it’s pretty clear that simply banning firearms and confiscating them does not definitively have any impact on firearms-related homicides, nor homicides in general. 

    Ultimately, the problem to be solved is likely not a gun problem, but a crime problem in general.

    Until we can all agree on the best way to address the root of the problem, the best thing we can do is to stay armed, keep practicing, and support the 2A groups that continue to protect our rights everyday. 

    Interested in learning more about international gun control? Let us know in the comments! Until all crime is solved, you should have your own protection with you — take a look at our Definitive Guide to Concealed Carry.

    The Best Gun Deals, Coupons and Finds

    Subscribe to Pew Pew Tactical's sales and deals email.

    22 Leave a Reply

    • Commenter Avatar

      This is why we and other countries sent small arms and ammunition to Ukraine cause they did not have weapons for the civilian population to defend themselves and their country. This is why we need to stay armed and not allow our weapons to be confiscated or 2nd amendment altered by anyone.

      May 31, 2022 2:44 pm
    • Commenter Avatar

      You did't say anything about India. We need guns for civilians.

      February 20, 2020 6:06 am
    • Commenter Avatar

      This article really didn't address the elephant in the room which is mass shootings. Many of the countries mentioned changed their laws as a result of a mass shooting. However, the article said very little of how that changed mass shootings in each country. Banning guns is never going to stop all gun violence or murders but if some regulation can change the amount of mass shootings in the world, then they should be considered.

      February 19, 2020 7:27 am
      • Commenter Avatar
        Thomas R Foster

        Bud, the author mentioned mass shootings multiple times in the article, i.e. Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., etc. All led to these respective govts. banning firearms. Did you read the article? Mass shootings are not the elephant in the room. A huge fact is they are not common despite what our media attempts to portray. Another fact is gun confiscation does not lead to less homicides or violent crimes. They go up in every single situation. Any death of a human being is tragic, whether it's one person killed or multiple. I see this simple fact lost on gun grabbers.

        February 19, 2020 7:59 am
      • Commenter Avatar

        There is a ton of logical information and historical data (not feelings) that proves that gun control doesn't work to stop crimes. Why then would it stop mass shootings? This is the issue. People are not thinking. The article does in fact address mass shootings in several countries. To be perfectly clear, GUN LAWS DON'T REDUCE DEATH!!! In fact its quite the opposite. More people die every year as a result of guns laws. PROVE ME WRONG!!!

        February 20, 2020 10:16 am
    • Commenter Avatar
      Joshua Schwarz

      Hi guys,
      As a god fearing, gun owning Australian I want to comment.

      The 1996 Port Arthur massacre was the catalyst for strict gun control in Australia. One man with 2 semi auto’s - one good guy with a gun (or steak knife!) could have put an end to it before the mass loss of life! But concealed carry has always been outlawed.
      Besides Port Arthur we have had NO gun crime massacres in Australia. Not before or after the strict regulations.
      As a legal gun owner in Australia there’s plenty of hurdles to jump through and we are very limited on what firearms we can own. All bolt/lever/pump actions can only have a 10 round mag capacity. Semi autos and pump action shotguns require an even more difficult to acquire license- generally restricted to primary producers and pro shooters. Pistols require additional hurdles- you must be part of a pistol club, participate in regular shoots and get a logbook signed by range master.
      All of the regulations are designed to deter people by the paperwork and bureaucratic rubbish!
      There are loopholes that can be exploited- ok, I can’t get a pump shotgun but my straight pull (with 5x5 shot mags) and lever shotguns are ok (and pretty capable of deterring bad guys).
      Legislation also demands that all firearms are stored (inoperable- no mags/bolts/ammo) in a safe that meets the government standard (rendering them useless in an emergency such as a home invasion). I have even been lucky enough to have the police conduct an inspection on my safe & weapons (the police do random inspections- but must notify owner in advance?!?).
      Australia is a great country and is very, very safe by world standards. In Australia bad guys usually receive a cricket bat (cricket is our take on baseball ) or fence post to adjust their attitude.
      It is very sad that my sheep like country folk seem so intent to degrade their freedoms....in the name of keeping them safe (safe from what? Spiders/snakes and jellyfish kill more Australians than guns do!!)

      January 12, 2020 9:30 pm
      • Commenter Avatar

        Dude that sucks try being a black male and they enact those laws here in the United States I will catch hell.

        I will lose most of my fire arms since most of them are military style.

        Next I will have the cops coming over to my house at all times of the day mostly at night due to the fact I live in a high crime area now.

        But in the end I will not give up my god given right to bear firearms in the nation.

        We as a people and I mean Black people have had to fight for the right to bear arms in the nation even though we were the first to die for the nation in the shoot that was heard around the world.

        (The Boston Tea Party) yes it was a Black guy who took the first bullet a free slave.

        But as you can see it goes on and on but in the end I will not give up my right to bear arms in this nation.

        As a former US Marine I sure in hell will not give my firearms.

        I will not go quietly into the night.

        (What most people whom enact these laws don't understand is we are not the problem we are the solution.)

        Semper FI

        March 4, 2020 10:18 am
        • Commenter Avatar

          Bless you my good man

          March 8, 2021 1:00 pm
    • Commenter Avatar

      I believe that New York made declawing your pet cat illegal and the Feds made animal cruelty a felony. Felons can't own guns. Hmmm.

      December 31, 2019 6:47 am
    • Commenter Avatar
      Silvio Legg

      Law abiding firearms owner here, long guns and pistols, from Brasil. We think that until government can guarantee people from been atacked, robbed and assaulted, they have nothing to do with gun control aside from registering them. And those mass murders could have been prevented if there was another armed person there.

      December 30, 2019 3:49 am
      • Commenter Avatar

        Just seeing this. Bolsonaro is now your president in Brasil. I heard him say in a speech that all Brasilians should be armed. Is this true, why did he say this, & how is that going?

        September 30, 2021 3:15 am
    • Commenter Avatar
      Will Huckette

      "We need to take the guns first, then do due process afterward." -DJT

      December 29, 2019 1:09 pm
      • Commenter Avatar

        I dont think so. And let safty to others, i dont think so

        December 29, 2019 5:26 pm
      • Commenter Avatar
        John Deering

        Maybe Trump can be removed from office first, then we will have an impeachment hearing.

        December 29, 2019 6:47 pm
        • Commenter Avatar

          TDS much? Enjoy 4 more years of him!

          February 19, 2020 8:50 am
    • Commenter Avatar
      Paul Bonneau

      The author does not understand "ex post facto" in my opinion.

      It just means you can't be prosecuted for *past legal* (now illegal) behavior. It doesn't mean you can't be prosecuted for *currently illegal* behavior. Nor does it place any barriers for the passage of new laws. If the government wants to say "turn them all in" (ignoring the 2nd amendment for the moment), it can do that, and the prohibition of ex post facto laws won't stop them.

      As a practical matter, the legislature does not keep people armed, nor can it disarm them. Brute force is the only thing that really matters. Either the people kills gun confiscators, or they don't.

      December 28, 2019 11:36 am
      • Commenter Avatar

        "Either the people kill the confiscators, or they don't" is a false dilemma. There are several--maybe into the hundreds--of ways current events may play out. Then again, I'm assuming you actually mean the people need to kill confiscators to remain in possession of a firearm...do you mean something other than that?

        December 28, 2019 3:40 pm
    • Commenter Avatar

      Fascism and communism move #1 is a gun confiscation to prevent unwanted death. But in the end is always genocide. Its coming.

      December 27, 2019 8:35 am
    • Commenter Avatar

      Thanks for putting this together, Paul! It's a serious job to go international with this and I appreciate the effort. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

      December 26, 2019 3:58 pm
      • Commenter Avatar
        Paul Yen

        Glad you enjoyed the article, markello! It never hurts to see what others have done to address problems that we have on our own shores so we can try and avoid the pitfalls they've encountered. Hope you and yours have a safe and happy New Year!

        December 27, 2019 5:22 pm
        • Commenter Avatar
          Steven C Jeffries

          Up NORTH here. I can think of no other thing that would cause Alaskans to separate from USA, than repeal of 2nd Amendment, or firearm confiscations from lawful citizens..
          I favor heavier prison sentences and LIFETIME restrictions for firearms possession by ALL convicted felons.
          If we can legally buy the firearm, we can open carry or carry concealed, with or withOUT a carry permitt.. There is more sensible good legal good news, but I have written enough.

          December 29, 2019 11:17 pm
          • Commenter Avatar
            Silvio Legg

            Couldn't agree more with you.

            December 30, 2019 3:53 am
    Join the community! Log in
    Please provide a valid email address.
    Password is required.
    Please provide a valid display name.
    Please provide a valid email address.
    The password should contain at least 8 characters with at least one number or special character.
    Please accept in order to continue.
    Trouble logging in?
    Type your email address and we’ll send you a link to reset your password.
    Please provide a valid email.
    Type your new password and hit button below to confirm it.
    Field is required.
    Account already exists
    We already have an account registered for email address () which is linked to your Facebook account.
    To log in type your Pew Pew Meter password below.
    Field is required.
    Account already exists
    We noticed that you have previously logged in with your Account which is linked to the same email address () - we can link both of your accounts together.
    In order to link your accounts, hit button below and log in to your Account with the same email as above.

    Account in Pew Pew Tactical means more.

    Login or create a free account to get the following
    Access and save hundreds of reviews, gun guides, and articles!
    Find the best daily deals on guns, gear, and ammo
    Manage your newsletter subscriptions and comments