Remington to File Bankruptcy, Seeks to Restructure $950 Million Debt

After operating for over 200 years, Remington, currently owned by Cerberus Capital Management and one of the largest arms manufacturers in the world, has reached an agreement to facilitate chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.  The move comes as sales have steadily declined following what can only really be called a drop in quality, especially with Big Green’s big earner the Remington 700 series. The legendary 700 series has suffered numerous setbacks recently, including a recall for an unsafe trigger, as well as the ending of several military contracts.

usmc remington 700
The USMC still employs a large number of Remington 700 series rifles.

Fortunately for Remington, and for the holder’s of the company’s $550 million term loan that reaches maturity next year, it appears that the company will be able to keep the lights on while they work to restructure a $950 debt burden.  This will also come as a great relief to the companies more than 3,000 employees.

According to a statement from Remington, following a Chapter 11 filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, Remington will undergo a pre-negotiated debt reconstruction that will see the company receive $100 million in debtor-in-possession financing that will cover operating costs during the bankruptcy proceedings.

Neither Remington or Cerberus Capital have so far responded to requests for a comment.

How Did This Happen?

Today’s bankruptcy announcement is the result of a several recent issues snowballing into an avalanche for Remington.  Trouble began with the safety recalls of the XMP trigger that graced many of the company’s 700 series rifles, a legendary rifle in use by several military and law-enforcement groups, as well as many civilian hunters and target shooters to this day.

remington 700
The Remington 700 is one of the most recognizable and successful rifles on the planet.

Further quality-control issues between Remington-branded products and Remington-owned Marlin rifles have seen consumer support for the company decline, especially during it’s Freedom Group period when Cerberus Capital, the enigmatic buyout firm, purchased Remington, Marlin, Bushmaster, DPMS, and others.  Things got so bad during this period that the N.R.A had to release a statement to quash rumors that Cerberus Capital had actually formed Freedom Group for the express purpose of tanking the companies involved.

Cerberus has long had a reputation for buying unwanted companies on the decline and attempting to turn them around and take them public, or sell at a profit, while often taking on a considerable debt burden.  In this case, the capital firm’s plans seem to have been unsuccessful thus far.

In 2012, matters were further complicated for Remington following a lawsuit related to the use of a Bushmaster rifle in the Sandy Hook shooting.  Following the tragedy at Sandy Hook, and with national interest in gun control measures at an all-time high, many of Cerberus Capital’s private-equity backers pulled support from the company.

And of course, the “Trump Slump” hasn’t been kind to any in the firearms industry, but Remington seemed especially hard hit by the sudden lack of apprehension consumers felt leading up to a perceived Clinton presidency and the return of gun-control measures to the forefront of the legislative docket.  The gun community breathed a collective sigh of relief once gun control measures no longer seemed imminent, and the expected windfall of panic-buying purchases, similar to what happened following the election of Barack Obama, never arrived for the company.

In truth, the Obama administration caused something of a bubble in the firearms industry as the N.R.A and others drummed up concern among gun owners that restrictive legislation was always just around the corner, which caused a massive growth in the firearms industry as purchases skyrocketed, particularly of AR-15-style rifles, one of Remington’s chief products and the most likely candidate for legislative restrictions at the federal level.

Compounding this issue, many retailers saw the apparent success of the Clinton campaign as an opportunity to profit off consumer fears of oncoming firearms restrictions and thus bought large amounts of stock that they are even now struggling to move after the election of Donald Trump and the subsequent drop-off in concerns regarding the purchase and sale of firearms.

Even new products such as the Remington Tac-14 have proven unable to galvanize consumer interest enough to jumpstart the company following the steep drop in consumer confidence that came after it became widely believed that Remington was dropping in quality across the board in favor of maximizing profits.

remington tac 14
The Tac-14 has been almost entirely overlooked by the gun-buying public in favor of the reputably higher-quality of the Mossberg Shockwave.

All of these issues came to a head last month when Reuters reported that Remington was working with investment bank Lazard Ltd to restructure it’s near-billion dollar debt pile.

Our Take

It remains to be seen what will become of Remington, and it’s sad to see a 200 year old company that can trace it’s roots back to making pre-Civil War flintlocks fall on such hard times.  Hopefully the current restructuring will be enough to get Remington back on it’s feet, but it’s likely we’ll see a sale of some of the company’s other assets such as DPMS and Marlin, if not a sale of the company itself as Cerberus Capital seeks to disentangle itself from what seems, on the surface at least, to have been a less than stellar investment.

 

 

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
RyanEric Hungjohn hDantearmed citizen Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ryan
Guest
Ryan

I bought a 700 ADL on Rem’s 200th anniversary, and an 870 Tactical this New Year’s, and I love em both. Apparently there was some “lifetime warranty” on any new Rem firearms purchased on the year of their 200th anniversary; unsure how that’ll play out now, but either way, I was very upset to hear of this financial disaster they got themselves into, as they were quickly climbing the ranks of my favorite firearm manufacturers. That said, the thought that there’s a hope that they’ll stick around is good news. I’m truly sorry for the apparent dozen or so people… Read more »

john h
Guest
john h

I purchased a very expensive Bushmaster ACR had to go back for the Trigger. They never made any caliber change kit available , No short barrel available . Locking rings out of stock for 3 years will never be in stock no chance for small parts. so to buy anything from Remington you would have to be an idiot because you are on your own if ever breaks especially with the bushmaster ACR. I would never buy anything from this gang .I got burned never again. because ether don’t live up to what they tell you and the quality is… Read more »

Eric Hung
Admin

That painful to hear…

Ryan
Guest
Ryan

I think we all knew the ACR was doomed, so I think your draw to it was the design without considering how little was available for it prior to purchasing. I’ve kinda stayed away from Bushmaster stuff anyway. Prior research does wonders.

Dante
Guest
Dante

This is what happens, when you let an accountant run any company.

armed citizen
Guest
armed citizen

I recently purchased a 2nd generation Remington R51 9mm pistol. It has performed flawlessly thru 500 rounds and is now my every day carry gun (I have a CCW). I have fired many pistols, and this is the finest natural point shooting pistol I have ever used! The R51 pistol was recently the “cover gun” of the American Rifleman. It only cost me $250 with the factory rebate, and came with 2 magazines. “Big Green” did not forget the common American citizen, with this pricing, all law abiding citizens can be armed and ready to defend against evil.

Jeff
Guest
Jeff

I wonder what impact this will have on Remington ammunition and primers.