Supreme Court Sides with Marijuana Users on Guns
The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark opinion that marijuana use cannot prevent Americans from owning guns.
PPT Editor-in-Chief. Professional journalist 15+ years. NRA & BLS instructor. 2000+ articles
We review products independently. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission to help support our testing. Learn more.
The Supreme Court handed a landmark decision to marijuana users who’ve long argued that a broad federal ban on gun ownership is unconstitutional.
In a unanimous decision, the justices ruled against the Trump administration, which defended the law. Instead, they sided with Texas resident Ali Danial Hemani, who argued that barring marijuana users from gun ownership violates the Second Amendment.
Though recreational marijuana use is still illegal federally, it’s legal in almost half of the U.S. This widespread use, according to the justices, negates the original intention of the 1968 law, which was to prevent dangerous people from getting guns.
“Whatever one thinks of these developments, the federal government has not just tolerated them; it helped fuel them,” Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the opinion. “All of which leaves it awkwardly positioned to suggest that the millions of Americans who now regularly use marijuana are categorically and unusually dangerous.”
The High Court cautioned that the opinion does not mean that someone addicted to an illegal drug can’t still be prosecuted. In fact, marijuana users deemed “dangerous” could still be prosecuted.
"The Court's decision is narrow," explained Gorsuch. “We do not address efforts to ban addicts, or those presently intoxicated, from possessing a firearm.”
The case came on the heels of Hemani’s arrest in 2022, when federal agents found a handgun and 60 grams of marijuana while searching his home. When asked, Hemani admitted that he used marijuana "about every other day.” Hemani was subsequently charged and convicted.
The National Rifle Association teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union and pro-cannabis groups to support Hemani. His lawyers challenged the statute, which prevents “unlawful” drug users from owning guns, though it does not define the criteria for an “unlawful” user.
"As the NRA emphasized in our amicus brief, no one should be deprived of their God-given right to keep and bear arms for engaging in nonviolent conduct, and there is no historical justification for doing so," NRA-ILA Executive Director John Commerford said in a statement after the opinion was delivered.
Ultimately, the justices agreed.
This decision is just one in a series of cases brought before the Supreme Court after the Bruen decision created a new test to determine the constitutionality of gun regulations.
What do you think of marijuana users owning guns? Let us know in the comments below.
Additional Resources